Pain management is an important issue following lumbar spinal surgery. Wound infiltration is a technique that a local anesthetic solution is infiltrated into the tissues around the surgical area. Previous studies reported that US-guided modified thoracolumbar interfacial plane (mTLIP) block after lumbar spinal surgery provided effective analgesia. In this study, we aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the US-guided mTLIP block and wound infiltration following lumbar disc surgery.
60 patients aged 18-65 years, ASA classification I-II, and scheduled for lumbar disc surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. US-guided mTLIP block was performed via the lateral approach in group T (n=30), and wound infiltration was performed in group W (n=30). Opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores and adverse effects of opioids, such as allergic reactions, nausea, and vomiting, were recorded.
Opioid consumption and the use of rescue analgesia were significantly lower in group T in all the postoperative periods (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h) (p&lt;0.05). The VAS scores for pain during mobility and while at rest were significantly lower in group T than those in group W 8 h after the surgery (p&lt;0.05). The incidences of nausea, vomiting, and itching in group W were higher than the incidences in group T.
The mTLIP block provides effective analgesia for the first 24 h following lumbar disc surgery, and it may be an alternative to wound infiltration for pain management.
The mTLIP block provides effective analgesia for the first 24 h following lumbar disc surgery, and it may be an alternative to wound infiltration for pain management.Piriformis syndrome is a painful entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the sciatic nerve under piriformis muscle for structural or acquired reasons. Myofascial pain syndrome is the most common cause. There are physical therapy modalities, stretching exercises, injection therapies and medical treatment approaches.In this case, we planned to demonstrate a different perspective to the treatment of piriformis syndrome with the ultrasound-guided dry needling treatment.Comparison of self-rating method and telephone interview method on outcome measures' results.
This cross-sectional study included 100 patients aged 18-40 years who applied to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinics with mechanical low back pain. Outcome measures [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index (ILBPD] were administered, and the duration of administration was recorded by two different methods. The self-assessment method and scales were administered by patients in the outpatient clinic and the telephone interview method; scales were administered by the researcher via telephone-calls 24 hours after the out-patient visit.
There were no significant differences observed in the results of outcome measures by the method of administration except the Istanbul Low-Back-Pain Disability Index (p=0.030). Outcome measures' results were highly correlated with one another when administered by different methods and orders of administration. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/wnt-agonist-1.html Duration of administration was significantly shorter when outcome measures were administered by telephone interview (p&lt;0.001).
Different methods of administration usually do not have an impact on outcome measure results. However, in some scales like ILBPDI, it may emerge as a factor affecting outcome measures' results. Therefore, adherence to an initially preferred administration method throughout the follow-up period is important regarding the reliability of the results.
Different methods of administration usually do not have an impact on outcome measure results. However, in some scales like ILBPDI, it may emerge as a factor affecting outcome measures' results. Therefore, adherence to an initially preferred administration method throughout the follow-up period is important regarding the reliability of the results.Frontal sinus osteomas are benign and well-defined masses that may cause various symptoms when they press on the surrounding tissues. Paranasal sinus osteoma is seen as a well-defined mass showing high opacity in Computed tomography. In this case study, we presented here a 53-year-old frontal recess osteoma with severe headache filling the left frontal recess in the context of the literature.Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome (THS) is an idiopathic condition characterized by periorbital and hemicranial pain, ipsilateral oculomotor and sixth cranial nerve involvement, good response to steroids, granulomatous inflammation of the cavernous sinus or the top of the orbita. A 25 year- old- male patient presented with severe burning burn pain near the left eye with double vision. The left eye exhibited semiptosis, limited outward gaze, and difficulty in the downward outward gaze. No history of trauma or drug use was reported. Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed thickening cavernous sinus walls to the left, while contrasted MRI sections suggested inflammation as indicated by intense staining. Cerebral arterial and venous angiography were normal. Parenteral treatment with 1mg/kg methylprednisolon commenced. The pain passed on the third day of treatment. Ophthalmoplegia began improving in the third week. The clinical symptoms were completely over after the third month of the clinic. The pain did not recur after corticotheraphy started. The cranial MRI of the patient was reviewed in a comparative perspective in the first and third months of the clinic. Inflammation was observed to get better. THS should always be considered in painful ophthalmoplegia cases. Cranial MRI towards the cavernous sinus, in particular, would suffice for diagnosis, provided that the vertex of orbita is not affected.It is possible to observe the in-vivo movements of nerves using real-time ultrasound. In this study, we aimed to visualize the movements of the sciatic nerve as a guide to identify the sciatic nerve to distinguish from surrounding tissue.
This trial was a prospective, cross-over comparative study. We included 25 healthy volunteers in this study. The movements of the sciatic nerve were visualized in the transverse view at popliteal and midthigh levels using ultrasonography. Anterior-posterior movements were assessed by measuring skin-to-nerve distance. The distances were measured during maximum ankle dorsiflexion, maximum plantar flexion and neutral position and compared with each other. We also evaluated the quality of dynamic (real-time) rotation/lateral movements of the sciatic nerve by assigning a subjective observer score.
The movement of sciatic nerve was significant at popliteal region with active and passive ankle dorsiflexion which was 0.32 cm and 0.23 cm respectively (p=0.003). The movement of sciatic nerve was significant at midthigh region with active and passive ankle plantar flexion which was 0.